Courtesy of Christie’sScience & TechNewsCryptobros spent $3 million on Dune book, believing it gave them copyrightCongratulations, you played yourselfShareLink copied ✔️January 18, 2022Science & TechNewsTextFelicity J MartinAlejandro Jodorowsky’s 1970 Dune11 Imagesview more + A crypto group going by the name Spice DAO bought a copy of a book about Alejandro Jodorowsky’s Dune at auction for $2.66 million – far over the estimated price – believing that it gave them the copyright to produce NFTs. Turns out they fumbled the bag. Badly. After purchase, the DAO (decentralized autonomous organisation) said it would “make the book public (to the extent permitted by law),” “produce an original animated limited series inspired by the book and sell it to a streaming service”, and “support derivative projects from the community”. However, what the crypto bros bought was simply a copy of the book, and not the actual rights. Essentially, they paid one hundred times the estimated value for a non-unique collectible that has been fully scanned and available online for free since 2011, and doesn’t give them the legal right to produce anything. One person commented: “Do you think if you bought a Spider-Man comic you could start making Spider-Man movies as well?” The group wrote on their forum that they hoped to sell NFTs of the book before burning it: “The goal is to issue a collection of NFTs that are technically innovative and culturally disruptive. A first-of-a-kind.” They later described the potential burning of the physical book as an “incredible marketing stunt which could be recorded on video. The video even sold as an NFT itself.” The storyboard – that the story’s author Frank Herbert once described as “the size of a phonebook” – is one of ten copies, as multiple versions had to be made to pass around to producers and executives. Featuring original illustrations by Moebius and H.R. Giger, the book was where the avant-garde French-Chilean filmmaker compiled his notes, concepts, and artwork as he tried to make the sci-fi epic in the 70s. In response, people have been sharing the free and readily available versions of the book online, as well as posting memes about the very expensive mistake. pic.twitter.com/sXIEkLdVMY— and enough champagne… to fill the nile!! (@GuyBeinDude) January 16, 2022I guess this is the natural result of NFT culture. You bought a scarcity-limited copy of a thing, and now you think you “own” the thing.— Michael Engard (@Kaelri) January 16, 2022thank you for helping to obliterate the myth that people with a lot of money earned it through skill and intellect— Arlan Hellison (famous) (@badpersonclub) January 16, 2022Expand your creative community and connect with 15,000 creatives from around the world.READ MORECould the iPhone 15 Pro kill the video game console?Is Atlantis resurfacing? Unpacking the internet’s latest big conspiracyElon Musk’s Neuralink has reportedly killed 1,500 animals in four yearsCould sex for procreation soon be obsolete?Here are all the ways you can spot fake news on TikTokWhy these meme admins locked themselves to Instagram’s HQ Why did this chess-playing robot break a child’s finger?Twitter and Elon Musk are now officially at warAre we heading for a digital amnesia epidemic?Deepfake porn could soon be illegalMeet Oseanworld, the internet artist tearing up the metaverse rulebookThe worlds of technology and magic are closer than you think