via YouTube/Lizzo MusicMusic / NewsMusic / NewsLizzo wins a court battle over ‘Truth Hurts’ plagiarism accusationsA countersuit from songwriters Justin and Jeremiah Raisen, which sought royalties from the track, has been dismissedShareLink copied ✔️August 15, 2020August 15, 2020TextThom Waite Lizzo’s hit song “Truth Hurts” is the subject of ongoing controversy between the musician and three songwriters, Justin and Jeremiah Raisen, and Yves Rothman, who accused her of plagiarising lyrics back in October 2019. Following the accusation, representatives for Lizzo filed a lawsuit against the songwriters. In a statement they claimed that the aim was: “to establish, in a court of law, that the Raisens are not writers of ‘Truth Hurts’ and have no right to profit from the song’s success.” Lizzo herself added her own statement October 23, which outlined her position. “As I’ve shared before, in 2017, while working on a demo, I saw a meme that resonated with me, a meme that made me feel like 100% that bitch,” she wrote. “I sang that line in the demo and I later used the line in ‘Truth Hurts’.” “The men who now claim a piece of ‘Truth Hurts’ did not help me write any part of the song. They had nothing to do with the line or how I chose to sing it. There was no one in the room when I wrote it except me, Ricky Reed and my tears. That song is my life and its words are my truth.” pic.twitter.com/Q4AKIPhMiE— Feelin Good As Hell (@lizzo) October 23, 2019 However, the controversy continued, as the Raisens and Rothman countersued in February 2020, once again claiming that they co-wrote the lyrics as part of another song with Lizzo titled “Healthy”. Now, a judge in the United States District Court for the Central District of California has dismissed the songwriters’ countersuit against Lizzo, on the basis that: “a joint author of one copyrightable work does not automatically gain ownership of a derivative work in which the joint author had no hand in creating.” Even now though, the drama looks far from over, as – according to Pitchfork – the judge has granted the plaintiffs leave to amend their suit to allege new and different facts. As Justin Raisen’s attorney, Larry Iser, says in a statement: “The court’s decision to dismiss just one of our five counterclaims is only a temporary setback, as Judge Gee has granted us leave to amend our pleading.” “We will be submitting amended counterclaims, which will address the court’s concerns with our original pleading. We know the truth may hurt, but Lizzo will not be able to continue denying our clients’ substantial contributions to the Grammy winning song for much longer.” Escape the algorithm! Get The DropEmail address SIGN UP Get must-see stories direct to your inbox every weekday. Privacy policy Thank you. You have been subscribed Privacy policy Expand your creative community and connect with 15,000 creatives from around the world.READ MOREQueer nightlife is thriving in Bucharest’s abandoned backroomsThe rise of Rico Ace in 5 tracksSwedish House Mafia unpack their Miami Ultra festival mega-set2Slimey isn’t here to be a meme artist: ‘I want a fucking Grammy’ Nourished by Time: ‘Music should be fun – but it can’t be fun all the time’K-pop has an AI problemCoals are kickstarting Poland’s dream pop sceneEvilgiane’s camera roll from his tour with Snow StrippersFinnish alt-pop star Pehmoaino: ‘Art helps us survive this dark country’10 great albums you may have missed in the last three monthsLamb is making ‘electronic lyrical’ music that sounds like no one elseArabic shoegaze duo Kiss Facility speak a language deeper than wordsEscape the algorithm! Get The DropEmail address SIGN UP Get must-see stories direct to your inbox every weekday. Privacy policy Thank you. You have been subscribed Privacy policy