Arts+Culture / NewsCreative people are ‘more likely’ to be psychopathsEmotional disinhibiton is regarded by these researchers as being integral to the creative processShareLink copied ✔️April 27, 2016Arts+CultureNewsTextDominique Sisley Think you’re a creative person? Well, we have some bad news for you. New research claims to have found a link between artistic ability and psychopathic behaviour; with the two apparently sharing a number of key traits. According to a study at De La Salle University in Manila, creative individuals require higher levels of emotional disinhibition, dishonesty and risk taking to cultivate their talents. All of which makes them significantly more likely to be (actual) psychopaths. “We argue that emotional disinhibition, in the form of psychopathic boldness, is actually integral to some creative personalities and functionally related to the creative process,” explains the study, which was published in the Personality and Individual Differences journal. “Generally then, a creative field might not just shape a person into a more arrogant or dishonest personality, it might be actively selecting them, not for the sake of having disagreeable traits, but because such traits meaningfully co-vary with creativity itself.” The research, which was led by psychologist Adrianne John Galang, claims that creative people are more likely to be ‘prosocial’ psychopaths, rather than ‘antisocial’. This means that they don’t necessarily require the cruelty and meanness that would link them to the latter. The conclusion was drawn after researchers conducted two separate experiments. The first asked 503 participants a series of questions designed to find ‘dark’ traits; including narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. The second looked specifically at psychopathy in 250 college students. “We show, antisocial behaviours of the kind associated with psychopathic meanness and disinhibition do not seem essential to the creative personality. Instead, they just happen to coincide with it,” the study clarified. “If the model proves useful going forward, it might be the cultivation of forms of boldness, while seeking to mitigate the more harmful forms of disinhibition, which would be the key to fostering creativity in both educational and professional settings.” Escape the algorithm! Get The DropEmail address SIGN UP Get must-see stories direct to your inbox every weekday. Privacy policy Thank you. You have been subscribed Privacy policy Expand your creative community and connect with 15,000 creatives from around the world.READ MOREWhy did Satan start to possess girls on screen in the 70s?Learn the art of photo storytelling and zine making at Dazed+LabsThe North FaceThe North Face joins forces with Loyle Carner for Red Box Live8 essential skate videos from the 90s and beyond with Glue SkateboardsThe unashamedly queer, feminist, and intersectional play you need to seeParis artists are pissed off with this ‘gift’ from Jeff KoonsA Seat at the TableVinca Petersen: Future FantasySnarkitecture’s guide on how to collide art and architectureBanksy has unveiled a new anti-weapon artworkVincent Gallo: mad, bad, and dangerous to knowGet lost in these frank stories of love and lossEscape the algorithm! Get The DropEmail address SIGN UP Get must-see stories direct to your inbox every weekday. Privacy policy Thank you. You have been subscribed Privacy policy