courtesy of Instagram/@nangoldinstudioArt & PhotographyNewsArt & Photography / NewsNan Goldin supports challenging the Sackler family in the US Supreme CourtThe photographer has long questioned the family’s opioid crisis links with her activist group, P.A.I.NShareLink copied ✔️August 4, 2019August 4, 2019TextThom Waite Nan Goldin’s opposition to the Sackler family – owners of Purdue Pharma, the Oxycontin manufacturer considered partly responsible for the opioid crisis – is well-documented. Along with her activist group P.A.I.N. (Prescription Addiction prevention Now) she has protested at several galleries and museums, including New York’s Metropolitan Museum, criticising them for taking Sackler funding, and petitioned public officials to demand intervention. Most recently, though, Goldin has backed an attempt by the state of Arizona to file a lawsuit in the US Supreme Court. The lawsuit claims that members of the Sackler family “siphoned” billions of dollars – more than $4 billion between 2008 and 2016 – from Purdue Pharma to avoid paying out on opioid victims’ claims. “We want the Supreme Court to make sure that we hold accountable those individuals who are responsible for this epidemic,” says Arizona’s attorney general, Mark Brnovich, in a New York Times article about the case (July 31). “We allege that the Sacklers have siphoned billions of dollars from Purdue in recent years. They did this while knowing the company was facing massive financial liabilities.” Goldin has voiced her support for the lawsuit, telling Artnet News: “We’re very gratified to hear this… I am anxious for it to go to the Supreme Court, and hope it won’t be thrown out.” She also stresses that her group has been trying to put the Sackler’s money in the hands of those they have wronged for some time, adding that they “need to be held responsible, and the money needs to be divided as compensation to the people who suffered.” Taking the lawsuit to the Supreme Court is still, however, what Brnovich calls “a little unorthodox” and no one seems sure that it will agree to take the case on. Back in March, the Sackler Trust (the philanthropic arm run by the Sackler family) froze donations to UK art institutions after being turned down by the National Portrait Gallery and the Tate group, which have long benefited from the family’s money. Last month the Louvre removed the Sackler name from its galleries, following P.A.I.N. protests. Expand your creative community and connect with 15,000 creatives from around the world.READ MOREFrom the grotesque to the sublime, what to see at Art Basel Miami BeachThese photos show a ‘profoundly hopeful’ side to rainforest lifeThe most loved photo stories from November 2025Catherine Opie on the story of her legendary Dyke DeckArt shows to leave the house for in December 2025Dazed Club explore surrealist photography and soundDerek Ridgers’ portraits of passionate moments in publicThe rise and fall (and future) of digital artThis print sale is supporting Jamaica after Hurricane MelissaThese portraits depict sex workers in other realms of their livesThese photos trace a diasporic archive of transness7 Studio Museum artworks you should see for yourself