Photo by HENNING BAGGER/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty ImagesArt & PhotographyNewsArt & Photography / NewsArtist ordered to return money after handing in blank canvasDanish artist Jens Haaning handed in two empty frames as part of a work he called ‘Take the Money and Run’ShareLink copied ✔️September 20, 2023September 20, 2023TextJames Greig If you’re famous enough, it’s possible to be celebrated for all manner of low-effort shenanigans. Who among us hasn’t dreamed of “satirising the commodification of the art market” by selling a piece of old tat to a hedge-fund manager for ten billion pounds? But this week, Danish artist Jens Haaning discovered that the art world doesn’t always take too kindly to being lampooned. Following a lengthy legal case, Haaning has been ordered to pay back 500,000 kroner (around £38,000) after handing in two empty frames, as part of a project he titled ‘Take the Money and Run’. The Kunsten Museum, based in Aalborg, commissioned Haaning to create two pieces of art back in 2021. According to the original pitch, the banknotes were intended to be embedded within these works, in order to represent the average incomes of Denmark and Austria. Instead, Haansen turned in two empty frames, and then explained to Danish media company dr.dk that, “the work is that I have taken their money”. He argued that it was not theft, but a breach of contract, and “breach of contract is part of the work”. Sure, why not! Sadly, the Kunsten museum did not recognise this as a daring act of genius, nor a searing commentary on the Danish economy, and asked him to return the money. Haaning refused, they took him to court, and a judge ruled that the devious Dane had to return the cash. Personally, I stand in solidarity with Haaning, partly because what he did was funny, but also because he was following in the footsteps of a long line of pranksters. The most infamous ‘blank canvas’ work was created back in 1953, when Robert Rauschenberg obtained a drawing by abstract expressionist William de Kooning, and then erased it until only a few, almost imperceptible traces were visible on the canvas. In 2019, conceptual artist Maurizio Cattelan taped a banana to a wall at Art Basel Miami, titling this Comedian and pricing it at $120,000. Before Cattelan could cash a check, however, a different artist - David Datuna – ripped the artwork off the wall and gobbled it up. “It is silly and not good for contemporary life,” Datuna later explained. Banksy has gone in for similar stunts: he once shredded his ‘Girl with Balloon’ painting in the middle of an auction and, on a later occasion, set fire to a screen print called ‘Morons’ before selling it as an NFT (although in fairness, at least Banksy actually made something first.) Perhaps the laziest artist of all is Damien Hirst, a man who hired a team of assistants to churn out his dot paintings – did a Danish judge force him to return his ill-gotten gains? And if not, why the double standard? Justice for Jens, whose only real crime was failing to realise that he wasn’t quite famous enough to pull off this kind of stunt. Join Dazed Club and be part of our world! You get exclusive access to events, parties, festivals and our editors, as well as a free subscription to Dazed for a year. Join for £5/month today. Expand your creative community and connect with 15,000 creatives from around the world.READ MORE10 major photography shows you can’t miss in 2026This exhibition uncovers the queer history of Islamic artThis exhibition excavates four decades of Black life in the USBoxing Sisters: These powerful portraits depict Cuba’s teen fightersWhat went down at a special access Dazed Club curator and artist-led tour8 major art exhibitions to catch in 2026This photography exhibition lets Gen Z tell their own storyHere are your 10 favourite photo stories of 202510 hedonistic photo stories from the dance floors of 202510 of the best flesh-baring photo stories from 2025Art shows to leave the house for in January 202610 of the most iconic photography stories from 2025